Charles Murray vs Milo, and the "good faith" principle

Why watch

Julia Galef applies the 'good faith' principle to specific platforming decisions, using Charles Murray and Milo as contrasting case studies. She argues that Murray deserves a platform because his work aims at truth-seeking, while Milo does not because his approach is primarily provocative rather than intellectually honest. The video also explores the inherent subjectivity of the good faith principle and why this subjectivity doesn't undermine its usefulness. Ideal for viewers interested in rationalist approaches to free speech and platforming debates.